|Ankor Wat Temple Complex, Cambodia. Photo by Mitch Sutika Sipus 2013.|
Yesterday I read the recent National Geographic article on the new possibilities to re-introduce extinct species of animals into the world via genetic engineering. The idea is to utilize DNA from animals that have died as a consequence of human intervention, such as the passenger pigeon, to repopulate the planet. Some researchers felt an ethical obligation to pursue the de-extinction of these animals, others note that due to environmental change, the native habitats of these species no longer exists and that repopulating the species might only lead to its eventual disappearance, again.
I found the article compelling, but it immediately made me question the ability to regenerate ancient cities from the dust. Rather than continually build new towns on the outskirts of today's cities or struggle with creating a sense of place in newly constructed environments, could we resurrect old settlements to connect the old with the new? Do archaeological sites of vast cities such as Pakistan's Mohen Darjo or Cambodia's Angkor Wat need to remain isolated like museum specimens?
I recall last year on a visit to Istanbul, Turkey the amazement that the historic fabric of the urban landscape was so neatly woven into contemporary living. There was little distinction between old and new, tourist zone and local habitation, business and residential. Unlike other ancient cities, such as Amman Jordan where the architectural heritage of the Roman Empire sits isolated from the urban core, Istanbul neatly integrated the past and the present. By resurrecting ancient cities from the dust, we could potentially create more urban environments as harmonious as Istanbul.
Human settlements rarely pop up by accident. So often they arise when one form of transportation intersects with another - such as a road and a river - and their lifespan is interconnected with the regional economic geography. By resurrecting a settlement, we could theoretically guarantee a particular type of economic and social success and likewise project a lifespan for the settlement based on our understanding of that settlement's history.
In this manner, we would have the choice to utilize or negate previous assets and obstacles to the settlement based on archaeological evidence and historical research. In settlements that consist of multiple layers of archaeological evidence, diligent mapping of the spatial allocation of artifacts and digital reconstructions might facilitate the conceptual rebuilding of historical events so as to better understand the spatial failures and advantages of previous civilizations. With a rough map of resource allocation and planning from multiple civilizations, we could better engineer a new city from the old.
Is this feasible? No idea. But if we can resurrect extinct animals, as far back as Mammoths, then why not resurrect civilizations?