Skip to main content



The Demand for Fuzzy Science and Explicit Design: Rationalism is Not Universal

Whenever I explain Design to non-designers, I essentially describe the scientific method - observe, hypothesize, test, repeat. Many designers work this way, although they might think creativity is something more magical, and are less inclined to describe their work as sequenced trial and error via prototyping.  Also, let's face it, clients will pay for magic but not for experimentation. The differences between science and design are more cultural than procedural.  

Science is better tuned to the needs of validation and design facilitates more generative insight, but the largest difference is that the scientific method is often stuck in the culture of science - we tend to think of the scientific method within fields like biology or physics, and thus resort to reasoning and intuition for day-to-day matters. Thus we think we use the scientific method all the time, but actually, we rely mostly on the power to reason.  

At the Threshold of ReasonUnfortunately, human reasoning is not univ…

Latest Posts

The Art Academy of Cincinnati - Education to be Radical, Relentless, & Radiant

Advancing New Economic Models by Design

Unlocking Machine Learning with Human Centered Design

Design Thinking to Optimize Effectiveness of City Planning

Impact Any Problem Like a Designer

Beyond Ideological Innovation - Into the Methods, Concept and Experience

Formulations of Post-Conflict Reconstruction Beyond and Within

Finding Zero Gravity in Big Messy Social Problems

How to Build Something from Nothing

Five Ways Americans Can Help Refugees Right Now